by Alt » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:48 am
Well, from bottom to top.
Yes, I understand that that was erasure rather than corruption. And that made the things worse. Erasure completely destroys the data, while corruption, in most case, destroys data partially, making it possible to analyze the remains and recover it. In your case erasure destroyed the MFTs, that is, the information on what and where files resided. Fortunately, NTFS has a lot of redundancy to recover data even some of them are gone. Unfortunately, long files suffer most. (It would be too lengthty to explain why).
R-Studio displays those files and folders on which information it has found and understood. If there was a file on which information is completely gone, neither R-Studio, nor other data recovery software can find and show the file.
The problem is that the information on files (file name, size, dates, place it occupies, etc) is stored in one place, while the actual data of the file on another one. And quite often the information on a file is good while its actual data are corrupted/overwritten and gone. And the opposite. That is why it is impossible to say exactly if the file could be recovered correctly or not unless it is actually recovered and tested. So R-Studio recovers all files the user choose for recovery and then goes the most interesting moment - the user has to test how correctly the data are recovered. All data recovery software work that whay.
You may make some gueses by previewing files (which in fact is data recovery without saving the recovered file). If most files are displayed correctly chances are high that the rest of files can be recovered successfully, too.
Well, from bottom to top.
Yes, I understand that that was erasure rather than corruption. And that made the things worse. Erasure completely destroys the data, while corruption, in most case, destroys data partially, making it possible to analyze the remains and recover it. In your case erasure destroyed the MFTs, that is, the information on what and where files resided. Fortunately, NTFS has a lot of redundancy to recover data even some of them are gone. Unfortunately, long files suffer most. (It would be too lengthty to explain why).
R-Studio displays those files and folders on which information it has found and understood. If there was a file on which information is completely gone, neither R-Studio, nor other data recovery software can find and show the file.
The problem is that the information on files (file name, size, dates, place it occupies, etc) is stored in one place, while the actual data of the file on another one. And quite often the information on a file is good while its actual data are corrupted/overwritten and gone. And the opposite. That is why it is impossible to say exactly if the file could be recovered correctly or not unless it is actually recovered and tested. So R-Studio recovers all files the user choose for recovery and then goes the most interesting moment - the user has to test how correctly the data are recovered. All data recovery software work that whay.
You may make some gueses by previewing files (which in fact is data recovery without saving the recovered file). If most files are displayed correctly chances are high that the rest of files can be recovered successfully, too.