R-Stdio vs file carving based recovery-tools

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: R-Stdio vs file carving based recovery-tools

Re: R-Stdio vs file carving based recovery-tools

by Alt » Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:44 pm

R-Studio isn't a "file-carving" recovery tool, and never has been claimed as such. File-carving recovery tools attempt to re-assemble fragmented files. R-Studio doesn't do that. If a file is fragmented, R-Studio can't recover it. That's why there's difference in speed.

R-Stdio vs file carving based recovery-tools

by joseph » Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:07 pm

Hello

I tested other regex-based file carving recovery tools(header/footers) and I am surprised how much faster R-Studio does work...

Is R-Studio not really a filecarving-recovery tool ?

Thank you!

Joseph

Top