by Data-Medics » Tue Mar 15, 2016 11:01 am
+1 for that. Also, perhaps R-TT should consider a beta program. It seems that many updates are really untested beta updates, and the stable version is already removed by the time we realize all the bugs.
Why not release new versions as "beta versions", let them be tested in the field and after a month or two of no new glitches reported, then designate it as "stable built". That way we can always fall back to a working version of a program we paid $1000 for.
+1 for that. Also, perhaps R-TT should consider a beta program. It seems that many updates are really untested beta updates, and the stable version is already removed by the time we realize all the bugs.
Why not release new versions as "beta versions", let them be tested in the field and after a month or two of no new glitches reported, then designate it as "stable built". That way we can always fall back to a working version of a program we paid $1000 for.