Ok, still puzzled.
I have the right order for the disks.
and I think I have the right block size (128kb) anything else seems to produce more corruption.
I don't think any settings are left for me to change. Maybe 1 disk is just corrupt??even though smart is ok.
any last thoughts before I quit ...
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:48 am
- Forum: RAID Recovery
- Topic: Intel ICH10R with raid 1 and raid 2 on same disks
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13936
- Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:27 am
- Forum: RAID Recovery
- Topic: Intel ICH10R with raid 1 and raid 2 on same disks
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13936
Re: Intel ICH10R with raid 1 and raid 2 on same disks
I did some test and I think I have ruled out a few options.
1. bloksize 128kb produces closest maching directory structure to the orig.
2. disk order is the same as raid 1, if I change order files get mixed much more.
Here is a image I restored:
[url]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/3718 ...
1. bloksize 128kb produces closest maching directory structure to the orig.
2. disk order is the same as raid 1, if I change order files get mixed much more.
Here is a image I restored:
[url]http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/3718 ...
- Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:46 pm
- Forum: RAID Recovery
- Topic: Intel ICH10R with raid 1 and raid 2 on same disks
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13936
Re: Intel ICH10R with raid 1 and raid 2 on same disks
Hi,
I think there is a miss understanding.
Both raid sets are on 2 Samsung 750gb disks.
Raid 1 is the name of the first raid set, it’s a raid 0 configuration. And uses 250gb of each disk (sum 500gb)
raidset 1 is my windows 7 disk and has 2 partitions 100gb and 400gb
Raid 2 is the name of the ...
I think there is a miss understanding.
Both raid sets are on 2 Samsung 750gb disks.
Raid 1 is the name of the first raid set, it’s a raid 0 configuration. And uses 250gb of each disk (sum 500gb)
raidset 1 is my windows 7 disk and has 2 partitions 100gb and 400gb
Raid 2 is the name of the ...