I agree those values are completely abusurd, however that is how R-studio shows them.
From what I see on the picture, strip (block size are incorrect)
That got me thinking. I tried the settings again and it worked... :shock: guess I had forgotten to change the default strip size last time again ...
Search found 3 matches
- Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:02 am
- Forum: RAID Recovery
- Topic: Raid 0 Data Recovery
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21184
- Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:27 am
- Forum: RAID Recovery
- Topic: Raid 0 Data Recovery
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21184
Re: Raid 0 Data Recovery
Alright. I've actually tried to follow that guide before. I am a little confused about a few things. Since the guide only shows one way, but my values differ from the ones in the example.
I've found these values: (some seem strange from what I've read)
Bytes per Sector: 190
Sectors per cluster: 124 ...
I've found these values: (some seem strange from what I've read)
Bytes per Sector: 190
Sectors per cluster: 124 ...
- Sat Jul 23, 2011 2:18 am
- Forum: RAID Recovery
- Topic: Raid 0 Data Recovery
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21184
Re: Raid 0 Data Recovery
Thanks! I never thought that would create any problems.
I constructed an image using the default options in R-Studio. However, while i found some files i got a lot of these errors:
"[FileId: 156009] MFT record child's claimed parent mismatch, aborting"
I will be able to recover some of my music ...
I constructed an image using the default options in R-Studio. However, while i found some files i got a lot of these errors:
"[FileId: 156009] MFT record child's claimed parent mismatch, aborting"
I will be able to recover some of my music ...